861)(Story_71) The Wife's Testimony. _ Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman

861)(Story_71) The Wife's Testimony. _ Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman https://mywritingsjunayedmn1.blogspot.com/2019/12/about-me-junayed-ashrafur-rahman.html ✒  

🌟 The video of how to translate my writings into your language.(আমার লেখাগুলো যেভাবে আপনার ভাষায় অনুবাদ করে পড়বেন,সেটার ভিডিও।) https://youtube.com/shorts/cB4L80u1IIc?si=jJV-G14OIP_qQeLA 🌟https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1GuWS35Joi/ 

Chapter One.

The Court’s Ten-Lakh-Taka Fine

The Central Court of Tashvir City had been crowded since early morning. Business owners, landowners, political activists, lawyers, and ordinary citizens had gathered in the main courtroom to observe various cases and hearings. The court had broad judicial authority. It handled cases involving land disputes, financial fraud, breach of contract, and property transfers carried out through abuse of influence.

One of the major cases scheduled for that day concerned a land ownership dispute. The defendant was Dravuk Korshan. He had been involved in real estate transactions and property management for many years. He was accused of accepting money and arranging for a piece of land belonging to one person to be transferred to someone else.

The most controversial witness in the case was the defendant’s wife, Vrashika Dravuk.

Vrashika had personally appeared before the court and testified against her husband. She claimed that her husband had accepted money and arranged for the ownership of one person’s land to be transferred to another. She also claimed to possess firsthand information about the transaction.

During the testimony, Judge Korvan Tashir asked several questions.

The judge said, “Are you certain that your husband accepted money and arranged for the transfer of the land?”

Vrashika replied, “Yes. I am certain. He accepted the money. After that, the ownership transfer process was completed.”

The judge asked again, “Do you have any financial receipts, bank transaction records, or other direct evidence?”

Vrashika replied, “I don't have all the documents. However, I know about the incident.”

The judge asked, “Were you personally present when the money was received?”

Vrashika remained silent for a moment before answering, “I wasn't present throughout the entire transaction. However, my husband admitted it to me.”

A murmur spread through the courtroom.

The defendant, Dravuk Korshan, had remained silent until then. Now he stood up and said, “Your Honor, many of the things my wife has said are not true. I handled the land documents, but I cannot be declared guilty solely on the basis of my wife's testimony.”

The judge replied, “Your statement has been recorded. However, your wife's testimony, your own statement, the land registration records, and the financial documents will all be examined together.”

The hearing continued for several hours. The court reviewed the land records, ownership transfer application, allegations of financial transactions, and statements from the individuals involved.

The investigation revealed that Dravuk Korshan had worked as an intermediary in the ownership transfer process. A transaction of ten lakh taka was also found in his bank account. However, questions remained about the actual purpose of the payment and its connection to the transfer of ownership.

The court stated that anyone making serious allegations against another person must be certain of the accuracy and evidentiary basis of their statements. Several inconsistencies were found between Vrashika's testimony and important documents. In addition, she had presented certain information as firsthand knowledge even though she had not been present when the events occurred.

The court eventually decided to hold a separate hearing regarding Vrashika's testimony and the inconsistencies in the information she had presented.

Following that hearing, Judge Korvan Tashir announced that Vrashika had deliberately provided misleading testimony and had presented uncertain information as established fact. Under the court's regulations, she was fined ten lakh taka.

The entire courtroom fell silent as soon as the decision was announced.

At first, Vrashika could not understand how the situation had turned against her so quickly. She had believed that testifying against her husband would strengthen her public image. Instead, that very testimony had resulted in a ten-lakh-taka fine.

Dravuk Korshan was not completely cleared either. The investigation into the financial transaction involving the land transfer continued. However, an important part of the additional allegations arising from his wife's testimony became weaker.

Chapter Two.

The Motive Behind the Testimony

Vrashika went straight to her car after leaving the courtroom. She said nothing. Her driver, Morshuk Javan, glanced at her through the rearview mirror several times.

Morshuk asked, “Ma'am, should I take you straight home?”

Annoyed, Vrashika replied, “Where else would I go? Just take me home.”

The car started moving.

It traveled along one of the main roads of Tashvir City. Election posters belonging to various political parties were displayed along the streets. Vrashika's photograph appeared on several of them. She was preparing to run for a seat in Parliament in the upcoming election.

Her campaign focused on establishing justice, fighting corruption, and taking an uncompromising stand against crime.

For several months, she had been delivering speeches at various public gatherings. She had adopted a political strategy of appearing in court proceedings, publicly exposing corruption allegations, and speaking out against influential individuals to increase her public recognition.

However, her decision to testify against her husband was not simply about justice. It was also driven by her personal political calculations.

After arriving home, she entered her room and closed the door.

A little later, Dravuk Korshan came in.

Dravuk said, “Why did you put me in that position by testifying against me in court?”

Vrashika replied, “I don't want to talk about what I said anymore.”

“Do you understand that your actions will cost our family ten lakh taka?”

“I didn't ask the court to impose a fine. The court made that decision.”

Dravuk said angrily, “You testified against me. You also made statements about things you never witnessed yourself. Will our family not have to bear the consequences?”

Vrashika replied, “If you hadn't done those things, I wouldn't have needed to testify.”

Dravuk said, “The investigation will establish whether I accepted the money. But why did you mix our family affairs with your political ambitions?”

Vrashika did not answer.

After waiting for a moment, Dravuk asked again, “Did you really think that testifying against me would make people vote for you in the parliamentary election?”

Vrashika fell silent.

Dravuk understood that the answer was hidden in her silence.

Chapter Three.

The Calculation Behind Public Recognition

From an early age, Vrashika had wanted to become socially prominent. She believed that the more people talked about someone, the stronger that person's position in society became.

After getting married, she used Dravuk's business connections and financial standing to become involved with various social organizations. At first, she attended different events as a guest. Later, she established a civic organization under her own name.

The organization was called the Citizens' Rights Monitoring Council.

Through this organization, she collected complaints against various individuals. Whenever allegations of corruption arose against an institution, she made statements to the media. Whenever a business owner was accused of illegally occupying land, she demanded an investigation.

However, an examination of the organization's records showed that no comprehensive reports had been published on the outcomes of most of those complaints.

One day, the organization's accountant, Trevan Kashuk, told her, “Ma'am, our list of complaints is getting longer. But we aren't publishing the results after each investigation is completed.”

Vrashika replied, “It's not possible to handle everything at once.”

Trevan said, “Then we should at least report the status of complaints that haven't been proven.”

Vrashika replied, “People need to know that we're fighting corruption. They don't want to read the details of every document.”

Trevan did not continue the discussion.

Meanwhile, the election was approaching. Vrashika began contacting political parties to secure a nomination for the parliamentary seat.

Her campaign adviser, Korvik Nashar, said, “Your public recognition is growing. But winning an election requires more than giving speeches. We need to create the impression that you're different from everyone else.”

Vrashika asked, “What can I do?”

Korvik replied, “If you can stand against wrongdoing even within your own family, people will see you as a courageous person.”

Vrashika then mentioned the ongoing land case against her husband.

Korvik remained silent for a moment before saying, “This is politically sensitive. However, if you testify with genuine evidence, your statement will attract public attention.”

Vrashika saw those words as an opportunity to advance her political career.

She believed that standing against her husband would make ordinary people view her as courageous and principled. Her popularity would increase, and she would win the election. Even after becoming a member of Parliament, she would still be able to maintain a happy family life with her husband.

But she had not considered how testifying against her husband might affect her family's financial situation. Nor had she understood how questions about a witness's credibility could damage her political reputation.

Chapter Four.

Who Would Pay the Fine?

The next morning, the Korshan family's accountant, Keshuruk Taven, arrived at their home. He was carrying bank statements, business transaction records, and a list of the family's assets.

Dravuk called him into his office.

Dravuk said, “Find out which account we should use to pay the court's fine.”

Keshuruk replied, “There is enough money in the personal account. But it wouldn't be appropriate to use the business account.”

Dravuk asked, “Would paying from the personal account create problems with our other family expenses?”

“Yes. We have two land installments and a business contract payment due next month.”

Dravuk said, “Prepare the complete financial statement, then.”

Keshuruk opened his documents and said, “There's another issue. The source of the money used to pay the court's fine must also be clearly documented.”

Dravuk replied, “The fine was imposed on my wife. I'm willing to pay it to protect the family's reputation.”

Keshuruk said, “That's understandable. But the source of the money must be clearly recorded.”

At that moment, Vrashika entered the office.

She asked, “Why are you discussing my fine so much?”

Keshuruk fell silent.

Dravuk replied, “Because the money will come from our family.”

Vrashika said, “Then pay it from the account in my name.”

Dravuk replied, “You don't have that much money in your personal account.”

Vrashika said, “Then you pay it. I'll repay you later.”

Dravuk said, “Do you understand that this fine isn't just about money? The court's decision has also brought our family into public discussion.”

Vrashika replied, “People will talk for a few days. Then they'll move on to something else.”

Dravuk said, “You don't understand people. The same people who heard why you testified against me are now questioning your political motives.”

Vrashika replied, “I'm going to run in the election. That's my right.”

Dravuk said, “Of course it's your right. But if your only reason for testifying was to gain popularity in the election, people are beginning to understand that.”

Vrashika turned toward Keshuruk and said, “Leave the room. You don't need to interfere in our personal affairs.”

Keshuruk gathered his documents and left.

Before leaving, however, he had informed Dravuk of something important. Along with the family's financial records, the documents relating to the land transaction needed to be examined again.

Paying the ten-lakh-taka fine would not bring the investigation into the original land case to an end.

Chapter Five.

New Inconsistencies in the Land Records

Three days passed after the court imposed the fine. However, Dravuk Korshan's land case began attracting renewed attention. The complainant, Trashekh Velvan, submitted additional documents to the court through his lawyer, Korshuk Navar.

The documents included a copy of the original land deed, the ownership transfer application, bank transaction records, and a written agreement.

The agreement showed that Dravuk's company had entered into a financial arrangement with another company before the ownership of the land was transferred. It also mentioned an advance payment of ten lakh taka.

However, there was a discrepancy between the signature on the attached receipt and the details of the money deposited into the bank account.

Trashekh's lawyer said, “We believe there was a planned financial transaction behind the transfer of land ownership. We need to identify the actual beneficiary of this transaction.”

Kashriv Toran, the court's records officer, asked, “Are you making these allegations based only on suspicion, or do you have specific documents?”

The lawyer replied, “We have documents. However, verifying their authenticity is the responsibility of the investigating authorities.”

Following the submission of the new documents, the court ordered a financial investigation.

Investigators began collecting records of Dravuk's company's bank accounts, property transaction ledgers, and communication details involving the relevant individuals.

Meanwhile, Vrashika wanted to make another statement to the media. She believed that renewed attention to her testimony against her husband would increase her political recognition.

However, journalists began asking her different questions.

One journalist asked, “Did you know that you could be fined ten lakh taka for giving that testimony?”

Vrashika replied, “No. I never expected anything like that.”

The journalist asked again, “Did you examine all the documents before testifying against your husband?”

Vrashika replied, “I knew about the matter.”

“Did you personally witness him receiving the money?”

Vrashika remained silent for a moment. Then she replied, “I was aware of the matter through our family.”

The journalist said, “But in court, you stated that you had direct evidence.”

Vrashika became irritated and said, “Why are you making such a big issue out of a few words in a statement?”

The journalist replied, “Because your testimony led to allegations against another person. And because inconsistencies in that testimony resulted in a fine against you.”

Vrashika refused to answer any more questions and walked away.

Chapter Six.

Preparing for Parliament

The election campaign for the parliamentary seat in Tashvir City officially began. Candidates from different political parties started holding meetings in various neighborhoods. Vrashika also opened her campaign office.

A large banner was placed outside the office. It displayed her photograph and campaign slogan.

Korvik Nashar was responsible for managing her campaign. He called a meeting with the campaign workers.

Korvik said, “We now have two problems. First, the court's fine. Second, the questions people are raising about why she testified against her husband.”

Campaign worker Vreshuk said, “We can say that she took a stand against injustice. The fine is a separate matter.”

Korvik replied, “That won't be enough. People will ask why she couldn't prove all the details of her statement.”

Another worker asked, “Can we say that she was the victim of a political conspiracy?”

Korvik replied, “Making an accusation of conspiracy without evidence will make things worse.”

Vrashika was present at the meeting. She said, “Why is everyone questioning me so much? Didn't I speak out against wrongdoing?”

Korvik replied, “You did. But voters now want to know what evidence supported your statements.”

Vrashika said, “People already know me. I've done a lot of social work.”

Korvik replied, “We'll highlight that in the campaign. But we cannot spread false information about the court's decision.”

Vrashika said, “I want to win this election. I can't accept having to answer questions about this fine at every public meeting.”

Korvik replied, “If you refuse to answer people's questions, they'll come up with their own answers.”

Although the meeting ended, Vrashika's frustration did not fade.

She kept thinking that the political advantage she had expected from testifying against her husband was now working against her.

Chapter Seven.

Voters Discuss the Case

The story of Vrashika's testimony at the court began circulating in markets, business establishments, and public meetings throughout the constituency.

One day, several voters gathered on the ground floor of a commercial building in Khalatli Market to discuss the matter.

Among them were businessman Dreshan Kuvir, transportation contractor Kashvir Tolan, and retired accounts officer Trashuk Mervan.

Dreshan said, “At first, I thought Vrashika's decision to testify against her own husband was an act of courage.”

Kashvir replied, “But now we're hearing that she couldn't prove many of the things she said.”

Trashuk said, “My concern is different. If she didn't examine the documents before testifying against her own husband, what will she do when we're elected to represent us and someone files a complaint?”

Dreshan said, “She has promised to fight corruption.”

Kashvir replied, “Making promises and fulfilling responsibilities are two different things. Before calling someone a criminal, there must be evidence.”

Trashuk said, “If we file a complaint against her, will she investigate it properly, or will she use it for political publicity?”

A few more people joined the conversation.

One of them said, “A woman who can testify against her own husband in court might send us to prison if she becomes a member of Parliament.”

Another person replied, “You can't send someone to prison simply because an allegation has been made. There must be an investigation and a legal judgment.”

The first person said, “That's true. But we don't want to vote for someone whose statements we can't trust.”

These discussions soon spread to other parts of the constituency.

Chapter Eight.

Fears of Being Sent to Prison if She Won

During one of Vrashika's campaign events, someone asked her a direct question.

The meeting was held at a large civic community center. Business owners, professionals, teachers, labor representatives, and ordinary voters were in attendance.

When the chairman opened the floor for questions, Kashvir Tolan stood up.

Kashvir said, “You've said that you take a strong stand against corruption. But when you testified against your husband, you couldn't prove all the information in your statement. If you are elected, how will you make sure that accusations against us are true?”

Vrashika replied, “I will act according to the law.”

Kashvir asked, “Would you have the authority to send someone to prison as a member of Parliament?”

Vrashika replied, “That is a matter for the judicial authorities.”

Another voter said, “Then why do you speak during your campaign as if electing you would immediately send corrupt people to prison?”

Vrashika replied, “What I mean is that I will work to ensure action is taken against corruption.”

A female voter asked, “Do you still stand by all the allegations you made against your husband?”

Vrashika replied, “As I've said before, the main point of my statement was true.”

The woman asked, “But was your testimony really based on firsthand knowledge, as you claimed?”

Vrashika became somewhat agitated and said, “I don't want to discuss my family affairs here anymore.”

Murmurs spread through the audience.

The chairman regained control of the meeting and accepted the next question.

However, Vrashika realized that her campaign was no longer just a competition against rival candidates. She also had to explain her own past statements.

Chapter Nine.

Another Dispute Between Husband and Wife

That night, Dravuk Korshan returned home and found Vrashika sitting with some campaign documents.

Dravuk asked, “How did today's meeting go?”

Vrashika replied, “People asked unnecessary questions.”

Dravuk asked, “Did they ask about your testimony?”

“Yes.”

“What did you tell them?”

Vrashika replied, “I said what needed to be said.”

Dravuk asked, “Do you understand now how important it was to verify all the information before testifying in court?”

Vrashika said, “Are you just looking for an opportunity to blame me?”

Dravuk replied, “I don't want to blame you. But your testimony against me has created financial and social problems for our family.”

Vrashika said, “If you hadn't accepted money for the land, none of this would have happened.”

Dravuk replied, “The investigation will establish whether I accepted the money. But accepting money and taking a bribe are not necessarily the same thing. You treated them as if they were.”

Vrashika asked, “Are you saying I lied?”

Dravuk replied, “I'm saying you went beyond what you actually knew when making your statement. You have to take responsibility for that.”

Vrashika said, “Are you trying to make me lose the parliamentary election?”

Dravuk replied, “Your election has nothing to do with me.”

Vrashika said, “Then stop speaking against me.”

Dravuk replied, “I'm not campaigning against you. I'm responding to the allegations made against me.”

A long silence followed.

Chapter Ten.

The Second Phase of the Investigation

Under the court's instructions, the financial investigation team began examining the records of Dravuk's company.

Investigator Trashuk Varan first collected the bank transaction records. He then reviewed the land ownership transfer application, the registration dates, and the receipts for the money received.

The investigation revealed that ten lakh taka had been deposited into Dravuk's company's account through an intermediary company.

However, it remained unclear whether the money had been paid directly to the landowner or received in exchange for another service.

The investigator said, “We need to verify both the source and the use of this money.”

Assistant investigator Kashriv asked, “Has the owner of the intermediary company given a statement?”

Trashuk replied, “A notice has been sent. They're expected to appear next week.”

The assistant investigator said, “We should also question Dravuk Korshan again.”

Trashuk replied, “Yes. But this time, we'll ask specific questions based on the documents.”

Meanwhile, the investigators also received a written copy of Vrashika's earlier testimony.

In it, she had stated that Dravuk had accepted money and transferred one person's land to someone else.

Comparing her statement with the bank records, the investigator found that some details matched. However, her explanation of the purpose of the payment remained unclear.

The investigation file noted that Vrashika might be called again for the next hearing.

Chapter Eleven.

Payment of the Ten-Lakh-Taka Fine

Before the deadline set by the court expired, the Korshan family paid the ten-lakh-taka fine.

After receiving the payment receipt, Keshuruk Taven recorded the transaction in the family's financial ledger.

Holding the receipt, Vrashika said, “At least the fine is settled now.”

Dravuk replied, “The fine has been paid. But the questions raised by your testimony haven't gone away.”

Vrashika said, “Why are you making everything so complicated?”

Dravuk replied, “Because the money you paid came from our family. It isn't just a fine. We've also had to change our business plans because of it.”

Vrashika said, “If I get elected, I can earn much more than that.”

Dravuk replied, “Being elected to Parliament doesn't guarantee any financial benefit for the family.”

Vrashika said, “I will become a member of Parliament.”

Dravuk did not respond.

Chapter Twelve.

The Political Rival

Vrashika's main opponent was Korvand Treshuk. He had been involved in the city's administrative and civic activities for many years. His campaign focused on local development, transparency in land registration, and public services.

At one campaign meeting, Korvand said, “When allegations are made against someone, they must be investigated. At the same time, if the person making those allegations cannot provide evidence, that must also be taken seriously. A member of Parliament is not a judge.”

Although Korvand did not mention Vrashika by name, the voters understood what he meant.

Vrashika's campaign workers objected to his remarks.

One of them said, “He was targeting our candidate.”

A member of Korvand's campaign team replied, “We haven't discussed anyone's personal life. We've talked about the judicial system and the responsibilities of elected representatives.”

The disagreement was also reported in the media.

Korvik Nashar called another meeting at Vrashika's campaign office.

He said, “From now on, we need to keep personal disputes out of the campaign. We should focus on presenting practical plans to voters.”

Vrashika asked, “Should we stop mentioning my testimony against my husband?”

Korvik replied, “If someone asks about it, answer the question. But don't make it the center of your campaign.”

Vrashika said, “What if people think I was wrong to testify against my own husband?”

Korvik replied, “Then your job is to explain what actually happened. Don't create a new story.”

Chapter Thirteen.

The Final Debate Before Election Day

Three days before the election, a television debate was organized. Vrashika, Korvand, and two other candidates attended.

The host began by asking Vrashika, “The ten-lakh-taka fine imposed by the court is still being discussed. Do you think this incident has raised questions about your qualifications as a candidate?”

Vrashika replied, “It was part of a judicial process. I gave my statement, and the court made its decision. I have paid the fine.”

The host asked, “Do you admit that there were inconsistencies in your testimony?”

Vrashika replied, “I have no separate comment on the court's decision.”

Korvand said, “One thing needs to be made clear. Citizens have the right to testify. But the basis and accuracy of that testimony must also be examined. If a public representative accuses someone without evidence, it can create serious problems for citizens.”

Vrashika asked, “Are you saying I cannot speak out against wrongdoing?”

Korvand replied, “Of course you can. But an allegation of wrongdoing and a proven criminal offense are two different things.”

Another candidate, Travuk Mershan, said, “I don't think this debate should focus on anyone's family relationships. We should discuss the problems facing the parliamentary constituency.”

The host then asked Vrashika about her election plans.

She spoke about several development projects, public services, and administrative transparency initiatives. However, questions about her testimony and the fine continued to dominate much of the discussion.

Chapter Fourteen.

Election Day

Voters began arriving at polling stations across Tashvir City early in the morning.

Vrashika sat at her campaign office waiting for updates. Korvik Nashar was collecting information from different polling stations.

Around noon, he reported that Vrashika had received fewer votes than expected at several locations.

Vrashika asked, “Which areas are causing problems?”

Korvik replied, “Korvand is ahead in Khalatli Market and the surrounding neighborhoods.”

Vrashika said, “But we had a strong organization there.”

Korvik replied, “We did. But the voters' attitudes have changed.”

Vrashika asked, “Because of the fine?”

Korvik replied, “The fine, the inconsistencies in your testimony, and the questions surrounding your campaign statements—all of these factors have had an impact.”

Voting ended in the afternoon.

Once the counting began, Vrashika realized that her chances of winning were becoming increasingly slim.

Later that night, the final results were announced.

Korvand Treshuk won by a substantial margin. Vrashika failed even to secure second place. Her total vote count was far below expectations.

Chapter Fifteen.

The Reasons for Defeat

After the results were announced, Vrashika remained seated in her campaign office. Outside, workers were taking down the banners. Several supporters came to console her.

Korvik Nashar said, “The results weren't what we expected.”

Vrashika asked, “I did so much work. Why didn't people vote for me?”

Korvik replied, “People saw your work. But they also questioned the credibility of your statements.”

Vrashika asked, “So was it a mistake to testify against my husband?”

Korvik replied, “You know better than anyone why you gave that testimony. But when testimony becomes mixed with political campaigning, people may interpret it differently.”

Vrashika said, “I thought people would appreciate me.”

Korvik replied, “They did evaluate you. Just not in the way you expected.”

Vrashika said nothing.

Chapter Sixteen.

Discussions After the Defeat

The day after the election, news reports about the results began appearing in the city's media outlets.

One report stated that several factors had contributed to Vrashika's defeat. Along with her campaign platform, her testimony in court, the ten-lakh-taka fine, and the distrust that had developed among voters were all discussed.

Several voters gathered again at Khalatli Market.

Dreshan Kuvir said, “The election results clearly show that people took the matter seriously.”

Kashvir replied, “But it wouldn't be fair to say she lost only because of her testimony. There are many factors in an election.”

Trashuk Mervan said, “That's true. But the questions about her credibility were a major factor.”

A businessman said, “At first, she thought that testifying against her husband would increase her public standing. But in the end, her family had to pay the fine, and she still lost the election.”

Another person said, “The biggest problem was that people couldn't trust her.”

Chapter Seventeen.

Dravuk's Final Question

Two days after the election, Dravuk Korshan returned home at night and found Vrashika sitting alone.

Dravuk asked, “What do you think about the result?”

Vrashika replied, “There's nothing left to think about.”

Dravuk asked, “Do you believe you lost only because the other candidates campaigned against you?”

Vrashika said, “Everyone spoke against me.”

Dravuk replied, “They had to respond to your statements. Voters asked questions, and you couldn't give them satisfactory answers.”

Vrashika said, “I thought that if I testified against you, people would value me more. My political recognition would increase. Voters would support me in the election. I would easily become a member of Parliament and still live happily with you.”

Dravuk looked at his wife for a moment.

Vrashika continued, “But now I see that testifying against my husband cost me ten lakh taka in fines. In other words, the money for the fine had to come from my own family.”

Dravuk asked, “When you testified in court, did you ever consider what would happen if you couldn't prove your statements?”

Vrashika replied, “I thought people would support what I said.”

Dravuk said, “Getting public support and proving an allegation in court are two different things.”

Vrashika said, “Now everyone is talking about me.”

Dravuk replied, “Being talked about was your goal. But you couldn't control the outcome of that attention.”

Vrashika fell silent.

Chapter Eighteen.

The Final Hearing in the Original Case

Meanwhile, the investigation into the land case against Dravuk had reached its final stage. The investigators combined the intermediary company's statement, bank records, and land registration documents into a comprehensive report.

The report confirmed that ten lakh taka had been deposited into Dravuk's company's account. However, the payment had been recorded as a legitimate service fee for arranging the transfer of land ownership. At the same time, there were inconsistencies concerning the landowner's consent in the agreement.

At the final hearing, Trashekh Velvan, Dravuk Korshan, and a representative of the intermediary company appeared before the court.

Judge Korvan Tashir said, “This case establishes that a financial transaction took place. However, the purpose of the payment and the legal validity of the land transfer must be examined separately.”

Dravuk's lawyer said, “My client was involved in the administrative work related to the transfer of land ownership. He did not create any forged documents.”

Trashekh's lawyer replied, “There are questions about the landowner's consent in the ownership transfer application.”

The judge said, “Those questions must be resolved by examining the original deed, verifying the signatures, and reviewing the statements of the relevant individuals.”

After examining the documents, the court found that the landowner's signature on one document had not been properly verified. However, there was insufficient evidence to establish that Dravuk had been directly involved in forgery.

The court ordered that the administrative validity of the land transfer be reviewed again and that the disputed records remain suspended until the necessary corrections were completed.

The allegation that Dravuk had accepted a bribe was also not established due to insufficient evidence. However, irregularities were found in his company's recordkeeping.

After the final order was announced, Dravuk's lawyer told him, “The most serious allegation against you hasn't been proven. However, the process of correcting the land records is still pending.”

Dravuk replied, “I will cooperate with that process.”

Chapter Nineteen.

The Testimony Record

A few days after the final hearing, Vrashika went to the court's records department. She wanted to obtain a copy of her testimony.

Records officer Kashriv Toran provided her with the necessary documents.

Vrashika read her statements again. The document said that her husband had accepted money and transferred one person's land to someone else.

She realized that she had combined two separate matters in her testimony. The first was the acceptance of money. The second was the legal validity of the land transfer. Although the two events were connected, evidence of one did not automatically prove everything about the other.

She closed the document and left the court.

That evening, she returned home and told Dravuk, “I've read a copy of my testimony.”

Dravuk asked, “What did you find?”

Vrashika replied, “There were several things I should have explained separately when I gave my statement.”

Dravuk asked, “Do you understand the matter now?”

Vrashika replied, “Yes. But there's no opportunity to change anything now.”

Dravuk said, “Your statement will remain in the record. It may be considered again in any future investigation.”

Vrashika replied, “I know.”

Chapter Twenty.

The Final Meeting

After the election results and the court proceedings, Vrashika's civic organization also began reducing its activities. Many members left the organization, while several financial contributors requested detailed accounts.

The organization's accountant, Trevan Kashuk, called a meeting.

He said, “We need to update the organization's financial records and complaint files. We don't have the investigation results for many of the complaints.”

Vrashika replied, “We'll gradually get everything in order.”

Trevan said, “We need to document the current status of every person named in the complaint list.”

One member said, “Many statements have been published in the organization's name. We also need to examine the evidence behind those statements.”

Vrashika asked, “Do you think the organization has suffered because of me?”

Trevan replied, “We're not blaming anyone personally. We're discussing the condition of the organization's records.”

The meeting ended with a decision to conduct a comprehensive review of all complaints, financial accounts, and published statements.

Vrashika returned to her office afterward. An old campaign poster was lying on her desk. Beneath her photograph were the words: An Uncompromising Voice for Justice.

She stared at the poster for a while.

Chapter Twenty-One.

The Family's Financial Statement

At the end of the month, Keshuruk Taven finalized the Korshan family's financial accounts. The ten-lakh-taka fine, business expenses, and election campaign costs had reduced the family's savings.

Dravuk reviewed the accounts and said, “Show the fine, election expenses, and other costs separately.”

Keshuruk replied, “Everything has been listed separately.”

Vrashika picked up the documents and asked, “Did we really spend this much on the election campaign?”

Keshuruk replied, “Yes. The total includes office rent, workers' salaries, promotional materials, public meetings, and transportation expenses.”

Vrashika said, “I thought that if I won the election, all this spending would have been worthwhile politically.”

Dravuk replied, “No one provides campaign funding with a guarantee that a candidate will win.”

Vrashika asked, “Do you still think I testified against you only for my own benefit?”

Dravuk replied, “You said it yourself. You expected people to value you more, vote for you, and elect you to Parliament.”

Vrashika said nothing.

Keshuruk closed the financial file and left the room.

Chapter Twenty-Two.

Outside the Courtroom

Several weeks later, Dravuk and Vrashika attended a business event. Many well-known people from the city were present. Among them was Trashekh Velvan.

Trashekh approached Dravuk and said, “The process of correcting the land records has started following the court's final order. I hope the matter will finally be resolved.”

Dravuk replied, “I hope so too.”

Trashekh turned toward Vrashika and said, “Your testimony has been widely discussed.”

Vrashika replied, “I know.”

Trashekh said, “I don't personally want to have a dispute with you. I had a complaint concerning my land rights. I wanted that complaint to be heard.”

Vrashika replied, “Your land matter is now being resolved according to the court's instructions.”

Trashekh said, “That's good.”

He then walked away to speak with the other guests.

Dravuk turned to Vrashika and said, “You see? People are still talking about the case.”

Vrashika replied, “Yes. But I don't want to discuss it publicly anymore.”

Chapter Twenty-Three.

The Final Accounting

Several months passed after the election results were announced in Tashvir City. Korvand Treshuk took office as a member of Parliament. Vrashika reduced her political activities.

Dravuk's land business also gradually returned to normal. However, he introduced new procedures to ensure that the documents for every transaction were properly maintained.

One day, through Korshuk Navar, he learned that the process of correcting the disputed land records had been completed. Trashekh Velvan's ownership rights had been officially restored in the government records.

Dravuk felt relieved when he heard the news.

Meanwhile, Vrashika was organizing documents from her former campaign office. They included records of her election expenses, the activities of her civic organization, and a copy of her testimony in court.

While sorting through the papers, she found an old statement of hers. It said that she had taken an uncompromising stand against corruption.

She held the paper and sat quietly for a while.

At that moment, Dravuk entered the room.

Dravuk asked, “What are you looking at?”

Vrashika replied, “Just some old documents.”

Dravuk asked, “Are you going to throw them away?”

Vrashika replied, “No. I'll keep them separately.”

Dravuk asked, “Do you have any political plans after the election?”

Vrashika replied, “I haven't decided yet.”

Dravuk said, “Then finish organizing the accounts of your organization first.”

Vrashika replied, “Those need to be completed too.”

Dravuk left the room.

Vrashika looked at the papers again. Three separate records lay before her: the record of her testimony in court, the record of her family's ten-lakh-taka fine, and the record of her defeat in the election.

The three events were connected, but each had produced a different consequence.

Her testimony had placed her under scrutiny before the court. The fine imposed because of that testimony had to be paid from her family's money. During the election, questions about her credibility had also emerged among voters.

She had expected that testifying against her husband would increase her public standing, win her votes, and help her become a member of Parliament. But the opposite had happened.

The court's ten-lakh-taka fine, the financial pressure on her family, the political controversy, and her defeat in the election had completely changed the outcome of her plans.

Later that night, Dravuk closed the family's financial file and went to his room. Vrashika was still sitting at the table, organizing the documents.

Outside, vehicles continued moving along the streets of Tashvir City. The election posters had long since been removed. The court documents had been placed in the archives, and the receipt for the ten-lakh-taka fine had been permanently stored among the family's financial records.

Vrashika picked up the receipt and looked at the date once again. Then she placed it with the other documents and closed the file. (The End) ©️All Right Reserved by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman

24°33'58.6"N 90°41'30.4"E

My home Location ✒ https://goo.gl/maps/RoKi3ekrhkm5PAHPA , But I don't live here. Rented out to other people.

Nandail Municipality, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.

Junayedmn1@gmail.com

My Writings ✒ https://www.blogger.com/profile/11734624718328723069

702) My success in writing. (লেখালেখিতে আমার সাফল্য।) – Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman ✒ https://literatureforalljunayedmn1.blogspot.com/2023/06/702-my-success-in-writing-written-by.html

707)After the fantasy of ministry.(মন্ত্রিত্বের ফ্যান্টাসির পরে।)– Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman ✒ https://mytimemyexperiencesjunayedmn1.blogspot.com/2023/06/707after-fantasy-of-ministry-written-by.html

637)Win prizes.(পুরস্কার জিতুন।) - Written by Junayed Ashrafur ✒ https://literatureforalljunayedmn1.blogspot.com/2022/10/637win-prizes-written-by-junayed.html

667)Case against AI ChatGPT. (এআই চ্যাট জিপিটির বিরুদ্ধে মামলা।) – Written by Junayed Ashrafur Rahman ✒ https://lawforjusticejunayedmn1.blogspot.com/2023/02/667case-against-chat-gpt-written-by.html http://ow.ly/Zawy104u7kO

#Intellectualproperty #Literature #Law #Contract #Writing #Wisdom